Canada’s
rejection of a bid by Malaysia’s state oil company for Progress Energy
Resources Corp. (PRQ) casts doubt on Beijing-based Cnooc Ltd.’s $15.1-billion
takeover of Nexen Inc. (NXY) and raises questions about the openness of Prime
Minister Stephen Harper’s government to foreign investment.
Industry
Minister Christian Paradis said in a statement he wasn’t satisfied the C$5.2
billion ($5.23 billion) acquisition by Petroliam Nasional Bhd., known as
Petronas, is in Canada’s interest. Harper’s Conservative government reviewed the bid under
its foreign takeover law, which says transactions must be judged to have a “net
benefit” to Canada.
“The
implication now is that the government does not want a foreign national oil company
to acquire Canadian companies,” said Eric Nuttall, a portfolio manager
with Sprott Asset Management LP in Toronto. “For a Conservative government to
make this decision is mind-boggling. The amount of capital that that decision
wipes out is stunning.”
The
Petronas rejection marks the second time in two years Harper’s administration
has denied a multi-billion dollar overseas bid. The government blocked BHP
Billiton Ltd. (BHP)’s $40 billion hostile offer for Potash Corp. (POT) of
Saskatchewan Inc. in 2010 after the province’s premier, Brad Wall,
opposed it.
Shares Drop
Shares
of Nexen dropped 5 percent to $24.14 in New York, about 12 percent below
Cnooc’s $27.50 offer price. Progress Energy shares plunged 9 percent to C$19.64 in Toronto, 11
percent below the C$22 per share offered by Petronas.
The cost of insuring Nexen debt against default rose. Five-
year credit-default swaps tied to the company’s bonds traded at 111 basis
points today compared with 98 basis points on Oct. 19, according to data provider
CMA, which is owned by McGraw-Hill Cos. and compiles prices quoted by dealers
in the privately negotiated market.
Petronas
has 30 days to appeal or provide additional concessions, at which point the
government will make a final decision, according to the statement by Paradis.
The company can be given more time if both parties agree.
Petronas
and Progress said today they will meet with Canadian officials “to better
understand Industry Canada’s requirements” for the takeover bid. The two companies “will work
together to ensure that the Minister has the necessary information to determine
that the proposed acquisition of Progress would likely be of net benefit to
Canada,” according to a statement released in Calgary.
Policy Framework
Harper told reporters today he wouldn’t “say anything that
would prejudice that particular discussion during this time,” adding that his
government would “fairly
shortly” publish “a clear and new policy framework” for foreign investment.
“Foreign
investment, generally speaking, is of benefit to the Canadian economy, and as a
general rule, we obviously welcome interest in the Canadian economy,”
Harper said.
Canada’s
ruling in this case shouldn’t be seen as a precedent for other
transactions, International Trade Minister Ed Fast said.
“This
decision does not set a precedent because every single application is
considered on its own merits,” Fast told reporters in Vancouver
yesterday. “Each application has its own specific circumstances that are being
brought to bear.”
The
ruling undermines Harper’s message that Canada welcomes foreign investment,
investors said. Harper has called it a “national priority” to sell more natural
resources to Asia, to boost growth in the world’s 11th-largest economy by
diversifying exports away from the slower-growing U.S. market, which consumes
three-quarters of Canada’s shipments abroad.
Canada’s gross domestic product of $1.74 trillion exceeds
Malaysia’s annual output of $279 billion, according to data compiled by
Bloomberg.
Proposed Projects
Current
proposed projects in Canada’s oil-sands, part of the third-largest oil deposits
in the world, require investments of C$220 billion, the Canadian Energy
Research Institute said in a March report.
Progress
Chief Executive Officer Michael Culbert said he’s “hoping” the Canadian
government will see a net benefit to the sale.
“What we’re trying to do is really move forward,” Culbert
said in a phone interview today from the Calgary airport before departing for
Ottawa.
Peter Hunt, a spokesman for Cnooc, said in an e-mail that
“our regulatory application is proceeding as normal.” Patti Lewis, a
spokeswoman for Nexen, did not return e-mails seeking comment.
Strategic Acquisitions
Petronas
has stepped up strategic acquisitions abroad while investing more in domestic
oil and gas exploration to replenish Malaysia’s diminishing energy reserves.
Tenaga Nasional Bhd., Malaysia’s biggest electricity generator, is among
companies that have complained of gas supply shortages.
The
Southeast Asian nation’s underground gas holdings should now last 37 years, two
fewer years than previously forecast, even after reserves grew 3.6 percent to
92.1 trillion cubic feet, Malaysia’s finance ministry said in a Sept. 28
report. Natural gas output
declined 5.3 percent to 5.62 billion cubic feet a day during the first seven
months of 2012, mainly due to “operational challenges,” it said.
“We’ve seen price increases of between three and ten-fold
for certain commodities and investment has surged,” Jeffrey Wilson, lecturer in
politics and international studies at Murdoch University in Perth, said by
phone. “This has really skewed the bargaining power in negotiations between
multinational resource corporations and governments squarely in favor of the
host governments.”
Decipher Intentions
Some
investors say it’s hard to decipher the government’s intentions without any
explanation for the rejection. Investment Canada Act rules prevent
Paradis from commenting, aside from saying the deal didn’t provide a net benefit.
The Globe and Mail newspaper reported Oct. 20 that Petronas
refused a last-minute request by the government to set a new deadline for the
review, citing three people familiar with the discussions. According to the
report, the government wanted more time to consider concessions from Petronas
that were needed to meet the net benefit test.
The
lack of transparency of the review process allows politicians to treat
controversial takeovers like a “pinata,” said Perrin Beatty, president
of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.
‘Black Box’
“What
we have today is completely a black box,” he said in an Oct. 19 interview.
Until the government provides more clarity, every large deal is “subject to
political debate.”
Opposition lawmaker Peter Julian, the New Democratic Party’s
spokesman on natural resource issues, said Paradis’ late night announcement
showed “not only a lack of transparency, but a level of improvisation and
incompetence that we’ve rarely seen.”
“I’ve been in parliament for eight years and I’ve never seen
an announcement made at midnight on a Friday night,” Julian told reporters.
The
government has been seeking more ambitious commitments from companies looking
for approval of foreign takeovers, said Dany Assaf, a partner with
Toronto-based law firm Torys LLP.
“When I first started practice in this area in the mid-90s,
Investment Canada regulatory approval was really just a matter of process,”
Assaf said in an Oct. 11 interview. “Today, the negotiations are more intense.
Businesses are going to have to offer more.”
Under
the Investment Canada Act, the government reviews foreign takeovers valued at
more than C$330 million.
Net Benefit
The government considers six main factors in determining whether an acquisition
provides a “net benefit,” according to Industry Canada. The criteria are
the impact on economic measures such as employment; the degree of participation of Canadians in
the business; the impact on productivity and technology development; the effect
on competition; the compatibility of the investment with “national industrial,
economic and cultural policies”; and the contribution to Canada’s ability to
compete globally.
Canada issued additional guidelines in 2007 for investments
by state-owned enterprises, saying such companies are expected to run the
acquired business on a “commercial basis.” State- owned firms may be required
to appoint Canadian managers or directors or list shares of the acquiring
company or Canadian business on a local stock exchange, Industry Canada says.
In announcing its offer July 23, state-owned Cnooc pledged
to follow through on Nexen’s capital spending plans and keep the company’s
employment level and management. It also promised to make Calgary the head
office of North American operations, and list its common shares on the Toronto
Stock Exchange.
Prior Rejections
Prior
to the BHP rejection, Canada blocked the acquisition of the aerospace division
of MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates Ltd. (MDA) by a U.S. company in 2008.
Before then, the country hadn’t rejected any foreign takeovers since the
Investment Canada Act took effect in 1985.
“After
BHP’s purchase of Potash was rejected, this will give the impression Canada
isn’t open for business,” Geof Marshall, who manages $6.3 billion of
fixed-income assets at CI Investments Inc. in Toronto, said in an e-mail.
“We’re entering a new era of capital controls as part of the next phase of
global deleveraging and this will see governments even more protective of
national business interests.”
The bid
by Beijing-based Cnooc for Nexen of Calgary has raised questions about the
degree of control state-owned enterprises should be allowed to have.
Fifty-eight percent of Canadians oppose the Nexen takeover, according to a poll
by Angus Reid Public Opinion released Oct. 16.
Conservative Concern
One Conservative lawmaker, Rob Anders of Calgary, said last
month some of his colleagues are concerned about the sale of Canadian assets to
Chinese state-owned businesses.
“I know
there are people inside my caucus who have concerns about asset sales to China,”
Anders told reporters. “I’m
never in favor of the whole state-ownership thing, especially in the case of a
non-benevolent country like China.”
“I
would say the Petronas decision certainly makes the case of betting on Nexen
weaker than it was before this announcement,” said Stephen Jarislowsky,
CEO of Montreal-based Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd., Nexen’s second-largest
shareholder according to data compiled by Bloomberg. “We believe that it should go through. Whether it
does go through, we don’t know.”
Harper said Sept. 6 he’s aware Canadians are wary of Chinese
investment. The government said Oct. 11 it had extended its review of the Nexen
takeover by a month.
“It could be the death knell of Nexen if the grounds are
around reciprocity and state-owned enterprises,” Jack Mintz, director of the
University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy. Canada’s foreign-investment
rules remain vague and “the government needs to send a clear signal on what’s
on and what’s off in terms of foreign investment.”
‘Intrinsic Value’
“It is unfortunate that this transaction was not approved as
anticipated,” said Linda Sims, a spokeswoman for Canada Pension Plan Investment
Board, which holds 16 percent of Calgary-based Progress’s shares, according to
data compiled by Bloomberg. “CPPIB continues to believe that there is
substantial intrinsic value in Progress Energy and that this proposed
acquisition is of long-term benefit.”
The Petronas decision is “shocking” said Gordon Currie, an
analyst at Salman Partners in Calgary. “I don’t yet know what the government’s
reasoning is, but this has implications for the Nexen and Celtic deals, and may
cause a ’chill’ on future transactions with foreign investors.”
Shale Gas
Exxon
Mobil Corp. (XOM), the world’s largest energy company by market value, said
Oct. 17 it had agreed to buy Celtic Exploration Ltd. (CLT) for C$2.86 billion
in cash and stock, adding oil and gas production in Canada’s Montney and
Duvernay shale.
Calgary-based
Encana Corp. (ECA), Canada’s biggest natural gas producer, fell 3.9 percent,
NuVista Energy Ltd. fell 3.2 percent and Cequence Energy Ltd., dropped 7.1
percent. NuVista and Cequence both have operations in the Montney shale region
of British Columbia. Celtic Exploration Ltd. fell 1.4 percent to C$25.84.
Investors should buy Progress shares if they fall as far as
C$17, said Catharine Sterritt, a Toronto-based risk arbitrage strategist at
Bank of Nova Scotia, in an e-mailed report.
Most
people in Canada’s oil and natural gas sector thought the government would
approve the bid by Petronas, said Mike Tims, chairman of Peters &
Co., a Calgary investment bank.
The
deal was viewed as positive because Progress is a small company that couldn’t
afford to extract resources quickly. A liquefied natural gas terminal proposed
by Petronas for Canada’s west coast would create new gas markets, he
said.
“We’ll see a bunch of stocks pull back because we’ve been
introduced, for a period of time, to new uncertainty until we see what the
policies actually end up being,” Tims said.
No comments:
Post a Comment